The Algorithm Can't Tell You're Not Looking at Me
By Dr. John S. Tamerin · 9 min read · November 1, 2025

I was working with a couple. The husband had been in therapy before — twice, actually. Both times it ended the same way. He told me he’d done the work. He’d “processed his feelings.” He knew all the right words. Attachment style, love language, emotional regulation. The whole vocabulary.
I watched him for about twenty minutes. He talked a lot. He used those words beautifully. And not once did he look at his wife.
“Do you notice something interesting about our interaction right now?” I asked him.
He blinked. “What do you mean?”
“You’ve been talking about your wife for twenty minutes. You haven’t looked at her once.”
The room changed. Everything he’d been performing — the insight, the vocabulary, the “I’ve done the work” — all of it evaporated. What was left was a man who was afraid to look at the woman he loved.
No sensor would have caught that. No transcript analysis. No sentiment scoring. No natural language processing. Because the data wasn’t in what he said. It was in where his eyes weren’t.
The Things I Watch
After fifty-five years in this work, I’ve developed a habit that no training program teaches and no AI can replicate. I watch.
I watch how people enter a room. Whether they sit close to the door or settle in. Whether they look at me when they talk or stare at their shoes. I watch their hands. I watch what happens to their breathing when they approach a topic they’d rather avoid. I watch the gap between what they say and how their body says it.
In a million years, what I do in that room wouldn’t happen with 99 other therapists, and it certainly wouldn’t happen with ChatGPT. Because I’m not just listening to what you say. I’m watching what you do while you’re saying it.
— Dr. John S. Tamerin
These observations aren’t party tricks. They’re the engine of change. Because the things people hide from themselves are almost never hidden from their bodies. Your mouth says “I’m fine.” Your shoulders say something else entirely. And when someone names the something else — gently, directly, without judgment — it creates a crack in the performance. Through that crack, something real can enter.
The Hug That Changed a Marriage
Another couple. The wife was telling me how disconnected she felt. How her husband never showed affection. How she’d started to wonder if he even loved her anymore.
He was sitting right there. Listening. Looking miserable.
“Do you love your wife?” I asked him.
“Of course I do.”
“Do you ever tell her?”
“I… I mean, she knows.”
“When was the last time you gave her a hug?”
Silence.
“Then why the fuck don’t you get up and give her a hug?”
He looked at me like I’d asked him to run a marathon. But he stood up. He walked over to her chair. He put his arms around her. She started sobbing. He started sobbing. I handed them both tissues and sat there while two people remembered what they’d been too afraid to do on their own.
Two sessions later, the wife told me things had changed dramatically. Not because I’d given them a technique. Not because I’d assigned homework. Because someone in the room said the obvious, uncomfortable, unprofessional-sounding thing that needed to be said. And because I was there, in person, watching their bodies, reading the room, responding to what was actually happening rather than what was being reported.
What I’m Thinking Right Now
One of my favorite moves — if you can call it that — is to ask a patient: “What do you think I’m thinking right now?”
It stops them cold. Most people have never been asked that by anyone, let alone their therapist. And the answers are always revealing.
“You think I’m being ridiculous.”
“You’re probably bored.”
“You think I should leave him.”
Each answer tells me something about the patient’s inner world — the assumptions they carry, the fears they project onto everyone around them, the story they tell themselves about how they’re perceived. And when I tell them what I’m actually thinking — which is almost never what they guessed — something shifts.
They realize their assumptions aren’t reality. They see, in real time, how their mind distorts other people’s responses. That’s not an insight you read about. It’s an experience you have. In a room. With a person.
ChatGPT has never told a patient to man up. Maybe that’s not a selling point. But sometimes what a person needs is not validation. It’s someone who will look at them and say: I see what you’re doing, and I think you can do better.
— Dr. John S. Tamerin
The Irreducible Room
There’s something about being in a physical room with another human being that cannot be reduced to data points. It’s not just what I see — it’s what I feel in the space between us. The atmosphere of a session has a texture. Some sessions feel heavy. Some feel electric. Some feel like wading through mud. That texture is information. It tells me where we are in the work, what’s being avoided, and what’s about to break through.
An AI can analyze the words of a therapy transcript. It can identify themes, track sentiment, flag concerning language. That’s useful. I don’t dismiss it.
But a transcript of a therapy session is like a photograph of a dance. You can see the positions. You can’t feel the movement.
Key Takeaway
The micro-observations that change lives — the eye contact that isn’t happening, the hug that hasn’t been given, the tears that are being held back — these are not data points. They are human moments, visible only to someone who is present, embodied, and paying the kind of attention that no machine was built for.
If you’ve been in therapy that felt like talking to someone who was mostly listening to your words, you know there’s something more. And if you’re looking for a room where someone actually watches — not just hears — you, that room exists.